Quantcast Rocky Mountain Collegian
College Media Network

 

The Antichrist didn't even get top billing

Ryan Nowelll

Issue date: 12/10/07 Section: Opinion
  • Print
  • Email
By making that statement, they're retreating from a stance they took by making the film in the first place, a statement I don't think they should be apologetic about.

Atheism is not something children need to be protected from.

To make that claim is to make many dubious assumptions about the function of religion in society, and while you can always say that as their parent you simply don't want them to know about it, doing so would be willfully small-minded and speaks more to placating your own anxieties than it does protecting their best interests.

The argument against atheism I usually hear contends that religion is the source of morality. Frankly, This idea went out with Cain.

While many are quick to point out that we are, by majority, a Christian nation, we have one of the highest crime rates of any First World country. Countries with the lowest crime rates don't have religion or devotion in common as much as they do a healthy GDP.

Further, atheism and agnosticism are not theories that simply cropped up out of nowhere. The words and laws claimed to be God's, and therefore immutable and transcendent, have over the centuries been used to justify countless contradictory value systems, and have instigated a fair share of immoral behavior on their own.

People stopped viewing religion as a moral absolute because the claim empirically disproved itself.

This is not to trivialize religion. It has a valid function to its practitioners, and what I'm saying shouldn't make that personal belief any less meaningful. Even if you don't buy that theory, though, it still only behooves kids to know what atheism is.

First, it doesn't speak much to the faith they had if a friendly CG polar bear can talk them off the path of righteous. More importantly though, how authentic is faith if it's a result of ignorance to the alternatives?

Does belief in God mean anything if it's the only thing you're allowed to know? Allowing a free exchange of varying ideas credits religion with being able to hold up under scrutiny, whereas censoring contradictory beliefs seems the act of someone who has grave doubts about the merits of their faith.

There is the possibility that this is all irrelevant, and that parents are truly upset over the lack of choices in holiday viewing.

The other big-budget family picture this season, the live action Alvin and the Chipmunks, does nothing to help the case for God either, if for entirely different reasons.
< prev Page 2 of 2

Article Tools

Viewing Comments 1 - 10 of 55

Craig Hawley

posted 12/11/07 @ 4:26 PM MST

Researchers have discovered that people of faith live approximately three years longer than those who have no faith.

Sorry but right or wrong , real or not , living longer appeals to me. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

Vince Mowery

posted 12/11/07 @ 7:56 PM MST

I don't think he was trying to attack Christianity, but more calling in to question why some Christians felt threatened by the movie. I haven't seen it or read the book, but from what I hear it goes against Christianity to some degree, and so it shouldn't be surprising that it is offensive to some. (Continued…)

Craig Hawley

posted 12/11/07 @ 10:19 PM MST

Good point Vince. My answer is just because some one may speak against something or not patronize this movie does not mean they are afraid of it or threatened by it. (Continued…)

the Real Ian Brown

posted 12/12/07 @ 1:45 AM MST

The New England Patriots are undefeated.

Rudy Giuliani might be the next president.

Pretty clear proof that there is no god.

Anyway, another Nowell classic. (Continued…)

David Wright

posted 12/15/07 @ 10:54 PM MST

I don't have a problem, as a Fundamentalist Protestant with divergent viewpoints. I do have a problem, as the father of a 5 year old daughter, with exposing her to entertainment that says her parents are wrong, and she should ignore them. (Continued…)

Craig Hawley

posted 12/16/07 @ 1:56 AM MST

Well said David Wright and a very good point.

KMD

posted 12/17/07 @ 10:05 PM MST

Hello, I love what this protest is doing for the movie, more and more people will go see it now. Just think, in the late part 2008 Harry Potter will be back with a movie and Dan Brown's 'Angels and Demons' will be out. (Continued…)

Craig Hawley

posted 12/18/07 @ 12:19 AM MST

Hi KMD I guess from your comments you are not a Christian. Well God bless you , some one should. I guess you non Christians can't read. The movie is not doing nearly as well as the producers predicted and they are whining like little girls. (Continued…)

(2 replies)   Details   Reply to this comment

KMD

posted 12/18/07 @ 3:31 PM MST

There seems to be a lot misconception about this country being founded on Christian principles, if not outright lies. Less than ten percent of the founding fathers went to church on a regular basis. (Continued…)

Craig Hawley

posted 12/20/07 @ 2:06 AM MST

Notice you did not respond to the fact people of faith live 3 years longer or that leading a Christian life has no down side.

Under God wasn't added until the 50's , but it was added. (Continued…)

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Advertisement


Advertisement

Home

Multimedia

News

Opinion

Sports

Cartoons

Entertainment

RamTalk

RamShots

Games

Sports Blog

Your Feat Blog

RSS Feeds

Buy Reprints

Poll

What is your favorite Thanksgiving dish?

Vote

View Results

Front Page PDF

Download Print Edition PDF