TASER THIS

Issue date: 9/21/07 Section: News
  • Print
  • Email
  • Page 1 of 1
FUCK BUSH

This is the view of the Collegian editorial board.
Page 1 of 1

Article Tools

Viewing Comments 1 - 10 of 1021

Glenn Wells

posted 9/21/07 @ 11:43 AM MST

For those of us who spent time in the military (20 years in my case), we certainly understand that you have the right to voice your opinion. As a matter of fact, many have died to uphold your right to freedom of speech. (Continued…)

(149 replies)   Details   Reply to this comment

Larry Pebley

posted 9/21/07 @ 12:25 PM MST

As a non-traditional student, I normally read the Collegian with a certain amount of bemusement. I was always taught that while editorials are opinion pieces, they should be articulate and the fact contained within should be correct. (Continued…)

(8 replies)   Details   Reply to this comment

Brianna Sawyer

posted 9/21/07 @ 12:59 PM MST

I fully agree with the comments made by Mr. Wells...God bless our troops whether you support the war or not. Not only was this disgraceful as a bold headline, but even more so because the tasering incident had nothing whatsoever to do with President Bush. (Continued…)

(12 replies)   Details   Reply to this comment

Larry Unruh

posted 9/21/07 @ 1:06 PM MST

I think the editorial board should enroll at cu under ward churchill's class. Don't forget to doctor your resume when you graduate.

(2 replies)   Details   Reply to this comment

Scott Wright

posted 9/21/07 @ 1:11 PM MST

Glenn is 100% right. This incident is as much the fault of President Bush as it the fault of President Clinton. That kid should have obeyed the numerous lawful orders of the police whether he agreed with them or not. (Continued…)

(3 replies)   Details   Reply to this comment

Rich Wehner

posted 9/21/07 @ 1:12 PM MST

If the intention of this op-ed was to gain some sort of national attention then it is a success. I heard about this on the Rush Limbaugh show today (9/21)

However before the editorial staff breaks out the champagne in celebration of national notoriety, know that it was done in ridicule. (Continued…)

(7 replies)   Details   Reply to this comment

Stu Lillard

posted 9/21/07 @ 1:12 PM MST

Um, I guess the Collegian view of Hate Speech has loopholes?
Lames.

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

Adam

posted 9/21/07 @ 1:13 PM MST

It's kind of funny that at the bottom of this "Editorial" it says "This is the view of the Collegian editorial board", because that's a lie. It's the view of the board, the reporters, the editors, the entire paper, the journalism dept, the staff, the faculty, the college. (Continued…)

(3 replies)   Details   Reply to this comment

Jeff Ingerson

posted 9/21/07 @ 1:16 PM MST

Ealier this year my son narrowed his choices for college to CSU and Northern Arizona University. If this is your editorial staff's best attempt to express their opinion in an intelligent manner; I am quite pleased he chose NAU. (Continued…)

(8 replies)   Details   Reply to this comment

Rachelle Backer

posted 9/21/07 @ 1:16 PM MST

I can't say I'm surprised by the editorial board's comments. After all, professional journalists say the same thing everyday (just not so blatantly). It wouldn't surprise me if the New York Times or Washington Post called to offer them jobs. (Continued…)

(2 replies)   Details   Reply to this comment

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Home

Videos

News

Opinion

Sports

Entertainment

Podcasts

RSS Feeds

Political Blog

Buy Reprints


Poll

What kind of underwear will you wear at next year's Undie Run?

Vote

View Results