Quantcast Rocky Mountain Collegian
College Media Network

 

City OKs only Christmas trees

By BRANDON LOWREY

Issue date: 12/1/06 Section: News
  • Print
  • Email
A Christmas tree stands on display in the Fort Collins City Hall West building at 300 LaPorte Ave. on Thursday. The City Council decided to allow them on public property, but denied menorahs.
A Christmas tree stands on display in the Fort Collins City Hall West building at 300 LaPorte Ave. on Thursday. The City Council decided to allow them on public property, but denied menorahs.

The Christmas tree on display in the Fort Collins City Hall is not an official endorsement of Christmas, council members said Thursday.

The council's decision to display on city property Santa Claus and Christmas trees while refusing to allow menorahs or other religious displays has outraged interfaith leaders. Council members said Christmas trees and Santa Claus are secular holiday symbols.

"I just about fell out of my chair," Rabbi Yerachmiel Gorelik said to the notion that Santa Claus is secular. "I never sat on Santa's lap, and I never will."

Council members are playing to the majority at the expense of alienating the city's religious minorities, he said.

City council members Kurt Kastein and Diggs Brown said that if one religious symbol is displayed, then the city would be obligated to display symbols for every religion.

"It's just a tree with lights on it," said District 3 Councilman Diggs Brown. "I do believe you could put dollar signs on that tree and it would have the same effect that it does today."

Though the city's formal holiday display at the Oak Street Plaza in Old Town is at the center of the debate, Christmas trees are also on display at several city buildings.

Brown and Kastein cited a 1994 Supreme Court decision that ruled Christmas trees with white lights to be non-religious symbols. But when asked if some citizens may associate the Christmas trees with Christianity, Kastein said they might.

"Sure, it could be, because Christmas is part of 'Christmas tree' and it's Christmas, and you're right that it is Christ's birthday," Kastein said. But he added that court precedent favors the city's position.

He said city attorneys told the city council that the menorah, which signifies Hanukkah, is a religious symbol. Kastein added that if the city were to display a menorah, it would also have to display all sorts of symbols - "Rudolph, Frosty, and countless other secular and religious symbols."

In short, it would lead to chaos.

As far as alienation goes, "the same argument could be made for Christians who aren't seeing a nativity scene displayed on public property," he said. "I would say to folks that have an issue with that that being inclusive on this particular display is next to impossible without being ridiculous."
Page 1 of 2 next >

Article Tools

Viewing Comments 1 - 2 of 2

Lin Sunshine

posted 12/01/06 @ 9:32 AM MST

This is so stupid I can't believe it. Santa and Christmas trees are secular? Last time I looked, they both represented the Christmas holiday season. (Continued…)

Sonya Le Febre

posted 12/04/06 @ 2:01 PM MST

The city might also consider the 1989 COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY ET AL. v. ACLU Supreme Court ruling that examined the religious vs. secular nature of both Christmas trees and menorahs. (Continued…)

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Advertisement


Advertisement

Home

Multimedia

News

Opinion

Sports

Cartoons

Entertainment

RamTalk

RamShots

Games

Sports Blog

Your Feat Blog

RSS Feeds

Buy Reprints

Poll

What is your favorite Thanksgiving dish?

Vote

View Results

Front Page PDF

Download Print Edition PDF